Today is Friday, November 11, 2025, and, I am a sucker for nostalgia, especially during the holidays as they always take me back. I think about those who greatly influenced my life, many of whom, have departed this world and gone on to their reward. Here's a blog I wrote that gives a little insight into my upbringing and in particular, the influence of my mom's dad, my grandfather, Andrew Rancher McMillan, or as we called him, Paw Paw Mac. This one was written in July of 2007. May God add His blessings. Amen. (Reader Alert: I was very wordy back then and that hasn't diminished over time. Sorry.)
Growing Up With Folks Who May Not Have Always Been Right, But They Were Never Wrong!
I grew up in a fiercely independent, Bible believing Baptist Church. The
people there were for the most part wonderful and sweet. Now I’m not
saying we didn’t have issues within the Church. Even as a child I could
detect something was
surely
wrong whenever people would sing “Makes Me Love Everybody” with energy
and feeling, but still not speak to a fellow member with whom they had a
long-standing disagreement.
My grandfather was one of the most
respected men in our Church. He was a Deacon in the truest sense of the
word, that meaning a Servant of the Church. He was not, however, one who
wanted to have anything to do with power plays or politics. He was an
intensely private man but his beliefs and what he stood for could be
recognized by how he lived. His simple approach to life was often at
odds with the other Deacons who wanted to exercise authority and make
sure the Church knew they were running things. They were not always
pleased with my granddad because he would not go along with anything he
believed to be underhanded or out of line.
Since my dad died and left us early, I grew up in the shadow of my grandfather. Wh
ile
he did not go out of his way to pick a fight, he always stood his
ground on what he believed. He was not a lodge brother. He wanted no
part of anything done in secret. He lived his life out in the open and
had no time for shenanigans at the lodge hall. This was not popular
since many of the prominent men in our Church were in the lodge, but
this was the man I learned to greatly admire. I have followed his
leadership and copied his pattern of life in many areas. My sons also
reflect some of these same patterns. I’m not condemning others for what
they do but this is how he impacted the way we look at issues in our
lives.
Our
small congregation practiced both close and closed observance of the
Lord’s Supper. At the end of the regular service when it came time to
observe the S
upper
those visiting and those who were not members of our local congregation
were asked to leave or wait outside until this commemoration was
completed. This was our adopted practice, this was our stated belief,
and while asking people to leave was never done with any intention to
make them feel bad, this was our approach and this is how it was
conducted.
Thi
s
was a far cry from the way it was done at my future wife’s Baptist
Church where her dad was the Pastor. They not only practiced open
communion but also actually drank from the same cup that was passed
around. I was at that time dating her but I can tell you this approach
was something very different for me. Of course I didn’t participate
because of how I had been taught but I can sure tell you I wasn’t too
unhappy about it, especially when old Bro. Oran, the biggest snuff
dipper in that Church, passed me the cup!
My wife’s Church used grape juice and we used real wine in our observance. O
ne
of their ladies would bake the unleavened bread and that was our
practice as well. Our real wine was not just any wine it actually had
been imported from the Holy Land. This is how it worked. Three Deacons
were assigned the responsibility to obtai
n
the wine. They would drive some twenty miles to the closest small town
that sold liquor. One of the deacons would stay in the car and observe
the two who entered the store. The two who entered the store would
observe each other as they would place the order and pay for the wine. I
can only imagine what kind of scene this made and I’m sure they were
all as nervous as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
When
the wine came in they would repeat the process exactly the same way.
I’m not sure if they rotated this duty but I would think they did. While
this might sound l
ike
overkill it was needful to make sure there was never any questions
regarding the acquisition of this special wine. I’m not sure if the wine
was locked up at the Church property or someone actually kept it, but I
feel certain the bottle was marked and a record was kept of how much
was used at each observance.
Today I
understand
much more about this ordinance. I know it was something introduced and
instituted by our Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. Theref
ore,
the purpose and meaning of this ordinance is all wrapped up in what He
intended, not what we might think or say. He said it was to act as a
reminder of His death on our behalf. Obviously that implies we need to
be reminded and He knew that. The clearest passage on the approach to
the Supper is found in the Apostle Paul’s first preserved letter to the
Church at Corinth. (1st Corinthians Chapter 10) There are many things we
can learn from the Apostle’s instruction to this local Church. That’s
the first important matter to consider. While these instructions were
useful for all Churches, then and now, Paul did not hold the local
Church at Thessalonica responsible for what was going on at Corinth. His
word was to those members covenanted together as the Lord’s Church in
Corinth. (Probably the First Baptist Church at Corinth, who knows? It’s a joke!)
In
the way the folks at Corinth had approached the Supper, some had failed
to give proper respect and reverence to the purpose of the ordinance,
that being the remembrance of the Savior. How serious was this issue?
Paul said some were sick and others h
ad
died because of how they approached this Supper. That’s kind of
sobering when you think about it. I will not try to evaluate all the
variety of teachings that exist regarding this ordinance. There’s way
too many, and sad to say, most, in my opinion, are foreign to “thus says
the word of the Lord”.
W
hat
have I learned through my experience and understanding of the
Scriptures as it relates to this ordinance? The overriding concern is to
honor the Savior by remembering His giving of His body and His blood
for us. Therefore, anything, and I do mean anything, be it music,
liturgy, ritual, practice, or approach that shades, diminishes, or takes
away from the remembrance of our Savior is clearly out of sync with His
mandate for this ordinance. And, yes, I am aware of the risk of serving
even a small amount of alcohol to an alcoholic, and would not do so. I
am also aware that many Churches today offer this sacrament to anyone
with little or no explanation about its meaning and purpose.
While I readily admit that I don’t draw bright lines like I once did, I have bec
ome
more committed than ever to this ordinance being expressly observed for
the purpose of remembering Him. Something else I have learned is that
any of us are
capable of going off the deep end. We can think ourselves to be more
Christian than others because we use real wine or we say closed or we
use grape juice and we say open. Truth is, those who really get it are
the ones who come prepared to recognize, remember, honor, and worship,
in spirit and truth, the One who died for us. May we all be counted in
this number. More later………
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment